2020 Scholarship Winners

2020 SCHOLARSHIP WINNERS

Denver Trial Lawyers ® is proud to announce the winners of our undergraduate and law school scholarship contests: Nicole Swatten and Theodora Maftei!

Nicole Swatten’s “Great Citizen” Essay

What Makes a Good, No Great, Citizen Within Their Community?

I believe service to others is what makes a great citizen within their own community. Service is made up of two pillars; selflessness and humility. In the age of technology, it is easy to get caught up in the self-gain webs of society. Someone that is a great citizen is cognizant of these behaviors and uses their privilege to help others, and their platforms to speak out. A great citizen understands that their community has shaped them, whether it be negative or positive. There is often a mentality of, “Get out of this town, and get to bigger things,” which can lead people to not appreciate what shaped them and their values. I understand that my community has supported me and shaped me, which is why I have a desire to give back. I understand that I could not have accomplished a fraction of what I have done without my community's support and that wherever I go I need to continue to raise up those people in my community that supported me. Being a good citizen is helping to forge a better life and path for others.

My family history includes a drug addicted mother and an abusive relationship with my father. Due to my tumultuous past, I am very aware that I may not be here today if it weren’t for many mentors in my life. In high school, my mentors taught me to believe in myself. My love for service to others started when I formed a women’s robotics team in high school and became the President of a mix-gendered robotics team on campus. I encouraged other women to believe in themselves and by the time I graduated, the amount of women in team leadership had tripled. My mentor of the robotics team was a woman and she had pushed me to believe I had the intelligence and leadership skills to be a great president. It was paramount that my team gave back to the community that had funded our robots, which led me to set up middle school tutoring sessions and participate in community events to inspire kids' love for STEM.

It was very important for me to continue my service to others as I entered college to study electrical engineering. I am a high school mentor for Young Engineers Shape the World (YESW). YESW is a STEM camp that meets every week to educate women and minority high school students interested in STEM about different career paths and majors of engineering. I also volunteer my time to give tours of ASU to prospective students and women interested in pursuing an engineering degree. I believe it is important for women interested in STEM fields to have a role model that doesn’t “fit into the mold”. I have often been told I don’t look smart due to my interest in makeup, fashion choices, and other characteristics. It is extremely important for me to set an example for girls interested in STEM careers.

Due to COVID, I wanted to find a way to serve young women on a larger scale. As technology continues to develop, it is easier to spread information and reach out to an audience. I am very involved in my campus and I was a NASA Intern from January 2020 to August 2020. I started to dedicate time to my social media presence (@engineeringnikki) in order to inspire young women’s love for space and offer advice. On my TikTok and Instagram accounts I have 5200 followers combined and I post to normalize imposter syndrome, feeling overwhelmed, not being naturally good at math but still pursuing an engineering career, and many more raw feelings that social media often hide. Additionally to the emotional facets I discuss, I post videos breaking down science concepts to make science more accessible to the general public. I had many young women message me to get advice on writing their college essays, choosing classes, and finding scholarships so I started hosting free online mentoring sessions on my weekends. I also review women’s college applications and have created an open source spreadsheet that has a list of scholarships engineering women can apply to. I know I would not be where I am today without my amazing mentors and can only hope I am providing the same mentorship to these smart, beautiful women of the future.

I am a great citizen of my community because I want to uplift others. I believe there should not be gatekeeping within the STEM field and it is important to encourage young women and people to believe in themselves.

Teodora Maftei’s “Checks and Balances” Essay

One Size Fits All

Clothing. Education. Sentencing. The common denominator shared among these items is the idea of “one size fits all”. However, in two of the three items, our society has learned that this approach is faulty. Clothing brands such as Brandy Melville that have marketed “one size fits all” have received intense consumer backlash for the lack of size diversity, which was completely justified in my opinion. There are many different body types and it is unreasonable to pigeonhole ourselves into erroneously believing there is no diversity among human shapes. In education, we have accepted that individuals learn by different means. There are visual, auditory, reading and kinesthetic learners. Children with learning disabilities are not placed in the same learning environment as children who are high performers because we know each group has specific needs. There is a fallacy that the “one size fits all” approach is just and suitable for sentencing when we have seen this approach has failed when implemented in other parts of our society. Justice is allowing an offender to be judged by the facts of their case and tried in front of a judge and a jury. Justice is not using the “one size fits all” approach to create mandatory minimum sentencing which strips both offenders and judges of their individuality.

Mandatory minimum sentencing laws subscribe to the “one size fits all” approach by blindly sentencing individuals who have committed nonviolent crimes to a minimum amount of time in prison. The most common offenses involving mandatory minimum sentencing include drug, firearm, and sexual abuse offenses (United States Sentencing Commission). While the thought behind introducing mandatory minimum sentencing made sense from a theoretical standpoint since lawmakers assumed these laws would deter individuals from committing these crimes, we have seen these laws have had overall negative impacts on our society and frankly lead to cruel and unjust punishment for many affected by these laws.

Since the 1970s when mandatory sentencing laws became more widespread, we have unjustly subjected individuals to serving minimum prison sentences. A first time drug offender can receive a five year minimum sentence for carrying five grams of crack cocaine, yet there is no way to distinguish whether this first time drug offender has a history of drug abuse or simply has made one costly mistake in an otherwise law abiding life (Golash-Boza). Both individuals receive the same sentencing because judges have been stripped away of their powers to decide a prison sentence. Mandatory minimum sentences have deprived offenders and judges of making and deciding their own case respectively. They have also contributed to an increase in prison populations. As of 2015, the United States is the world leader in incarceration, imprisoning 698 people for every 100,000 adults (Golash-Boza). As of September 2016, more than half of federal inmates were convinced of an offense that carried a mandatory minimum penalty (United States Sentencing Commission). This form of sentencing also disproportionately affects minority communities. In 2016, 40% of the offenders carrying a mandatory minimum sentence were Hispanic (United States Sentencing Commission).

What has happened in the meantime? Crime rates have fallen yet incarceration continues to rise. We continue to spend more and more on incarceration. In 2017, the federal prison budget system was about $7 billion, almost $2 billion more than the budget to care for homeless people (Criminal Justice Policy Foundation). The families of these non violent offenders have been broken up and their local communities have suffered. Reform in minimum mandatory sentencing could lead to reallocating money from the prison budget to create rehabilitation programs for first time offenders, leading to less individuals incarcerated and less taxpayer money spent on the prison system and instead spent on programs that have a better return on investment. There are alternative ways to educate offenders outside of imprisonment and still provide justice to offenders and the individuals they’ve affected by their crimes. By doing this we would also help keep families together and help rebuild disadvantaged communities.

By maintaining mandatory minimum sentences, we have stripped away an individual’s right to a fair trial since we have grouped all offenders under the “one size fits all” approach. There is nothing just about blindly bucketing offenders into certain minimum prison sentences without understanding the nuances of each individual that is to be sentenced. We know that the “one size fits all” approach hasn’t worked in other aspects of society so if we want to provide justice, we should stop using this faulty logic in deciding something as serious as a person’s future.

LANDMARK VERDICTS & SETTLEMENTS

Hundred of Millions of Dollars Recovered for Our Clients
  • Birth Injury Involving Misuse of Drug to Induce Labor $70 Million

    $70 million arbitration award, the largest known medical malpractice arbitration award in U.S. history. David S Woodruff handled this birth injury case involving an HMO labor/delivery unit that misused Cytotec, a drug used to induce labor.

  • Settlement for Individuals Injured by a Defective Product $23 Million

    Settlement for group of individuals injured by a defective product. Dan was a member of a national team of lawyers who helped secure this settlement. The largest single settlement in the country was paid to Dan’s individual client.

  • Largest Medical Malpractice Settlement in Colorado $22.3 Million

    $22.3 million medical malpractice settlement. In 2016 David Woodruff obtained the largest known medical malpractice settlement in Colorado.

  • Medical Malpractice Verdict for Victim of Paralysis $15 Million

    A jury handed down a $15 million verdict to a man who was paralyzed from the chest down just hours after a doctor at Memorial Hospital in Colorado Springs discharged him. It’s the largest sum ever awarded in a medical malpractice suit in Colorado.

  • Drunk Driving Accident Resulting in Rollover Collision $8.91 Million

    Rollover collision – Steve Wahlberg represented the driver of a vehicle struck by a drunk driver. The Court entered judgment of $4,455,000 including 1.5 million in physical impairment, $4,455,000 in punitive damages.

  • Commercial Vehicle Accident Resulting in Catastrophic Injury $8 Million

    An attorney from our firm served as lead counsel in a contested liability accident involving a commercial vehicle. Our client was catastrophically injured and he successfully negotiated a $8,000,000 settlement on her behalf.

  • Birth Injury Verdict Involving a Misplaced Device $7.2 Million

    $7 million medical malpractice jury verdict. David Woodruff handled this birth injury case, which culminated in a 2-week jury trial in Colorado Springs. The case involved a physician who misplaced a “vacuum extraction device” while delivering the infant.

  • The Largest Personal Injury Verdict in Colorado in 2016 $6 Million

    Steve Wahlberg received the largest personal injury verdict in Colorado in 2016. They represented a pedestrian who was run over by a bus. The jury awarded the fourth largest verdict in Colorado History for permanent physical impairment.

  • Truck Accident Settlement for Client Struck by Falling Cargo $5 Million

    Mr. Nimmo settled a case on behalf of his client who was severely injured when he was struck by falling cargo that fell from a trailer.

  • Settlement for Woman Injured by Defective Cream Whipper $5 Million

    $5 million defective product settlement. David Woodruff represented a young woman severely injured by a “cream whipper” that exploded in her face, fracturing her skull in 7 places, causing extensive brain injury and permanent damage to her vestibular system.

Client testimonials

Real Stories From Real People
  • “Parker Stinar is astonishingly patient, thorough, and has the ability to communicate in laymen’s terms, putting things in terms I could understand. He always maintained a positive attitude, even in times I felt discouraged and lost.”

    - Brian M.
  • “Dan Sloane is very professional and impressed me during negotiations with his clever strategies. He sincerely cares and seeks justice. Dan knows what he's doing and won our case for us.”

    - Julie D.
  • “David Woodruff and his team worked long and hard for my settlement. They were able to get more than I expected. I would highly recommend them.”

    - Heather N.
  • “Michael Nimmo took my case that a dozen other lawyers rejected. He was incredibly thorough backing up everything with my doctors. He was supportive, caring, and obviously legally astute. He won the case and the award helped me to transition to retirement b”

    - Patty M.
  • “Throughout the entire process, Stephen Wahlberg and his staff were professional, timely, and went above and beyond in their empathetic approach to the family and diligence and confidence in pursuing the case. I highly recommend him to anyone.”

    - Catrina A.
  • “Dan Sloane of Denver Trial Lawyer was always there and helped guide me step by step through the process. He made the case easier for me to understand. I recommend him highly! Very trustworthy!”

    - Esther G.

Why Hire Denver Trial Lawyers

  • Hundreds of Millions in Recoveries

    We have represented thousands of individuals against insurance companies and corporations, recovering hundreds of millions in the process.

  • A Voice for Change

    Attorneys at our firm have been at the helm of cases that have gone on to influence legislation, change laws, and impact society for the better.

  • We Won't Settle For Less

    We are trial lawyers through and through, and we will take your case as far as it can go.

  • No Cost Unless We Win

    We represent clients on a contingency fee basis. We only get paid if we win your case.

  • Serving Our Community

    Giving back to our community is extremely important to us. We support a number of charitable programs.

  • A Passion for Justice

    Our goal is to level the playing field between our clients and the large companies and corporations they are up against.

Get a Free Consultation

There Are No Fees Unless We Win
  • Please enter your first name.
  • Please enter your last name.
  • Please enter your phone number.
    This isn't a valid phone number.
  • Please enter your email address.
    This isn't a valid email address.
  • Please make a selection.
  • Please enter a message.