2019 Scholarship Winners

2019 SCHOLARSHIP WINNERS

Denver Trial Lawyers ® is proud to announce the winners of our undergraduate and law school scholarship contests: Marcus Lantier and Derick Fong

Marcus Lantier’s “Great Citizen” Essay

Daily detentions, over twenty-one suspensions, alternative school, and poor peer influences is what perfectly described my middle school experience. Coming from a divorced family household at a young age, becoming my own man was an extremely challenging task without my father in the picture. My mother worked as much overtime as she could to support me and my sister on her own with a meager Walmart salary. A beautiful, hard working woman is an understatement when it comes to describing my mother, but with her always at work, I had no role models that could pour into me and show me what it really meant to be a man and a good person. This all changed the day I was introduced to school teacher Germaine Johnson.

With the raging emotions of a young teenage boy that never really understood what broke apart his family, but knew enough to have a large muster of anger built up from the uncontrollable situations; sports were my outlet. I made the middle school soccer team, and had a successful year as a main component in the teams success. Following the soccer season, the coach asked me to play for his lacrosse team. This coach was none other than Germaine Johnson. I had never played lacrosse before, but this man took hours out of his day to teach me the fundamentals of the game because he saw something in me when no one else did. He poured into me through athletics, while educating me on what life is really about, and how to handle the trials that come with it. I was thirteen around this time and had finally discovered my first male role model. Nevertheless, I still managed to ruin a good thing.

Within my middle school atmosphere, fighting, gambling, and drugs were all apart of the everyday norms. I fell right into the middle of all that by being apart of the worst clique at school. Believing it was cool to systematically set myself up for failure by doing a multitude of negative behaviors caught up to me quickly. It was a week before my first ever lacrosse season would begin. I was eager to show off the multitude of skills I had developed with hours of work supplied by Coach Johnson. Days leading up before the first game, I was involved in a physical altercation with another student over ignorant insults that really dug into my young, already fragile ego. This event led to my overall expulsion from the lacrosse team. This hit me like a brick wall emotionally as I let down the only man who gave me the time of day. Hours of Coach Johnsons’ own time put seemingly to waste because I could not just let go of simple slurs thrown at me by a peer. For the remaining year after this event, I could not muster the strength to even look my coach in the eyes. A spiraling effect occurred, and my behavior continued a declining trend.

Soon enough alternative school was in my immediate future. The school's principal, and vice principal deemed it necessary for my presence to be positioned at another institution where students of my behavior were allocated. Alternative school students were notorious for dropping out, and seeing jail time in the near future. Nothing good was in my line of sites, until Coach Johnson heard of these endeavors. Germaine pleaded a case that revolved around my continued presence at my current middle school. Deeming that I was in fact a great student and young adolescence, just in need of direction. A week long debate for my case occurred while I was sidelined by out of school suspension. The verdict of my trial was informed to me by Germaine himself, letting me know I would be given one more chance to prove I can make a change in my debilitating behavior. An immediate wave of gratitude burst through me. A man I once let down, having no confidence to even look at, came once again to my aid. This man gave me the realization that I was worth something. That I had the ability to change my life around. In this realization, I managed to successfully make it to college as a first generation student in my family, as well as a men’s division two lacrosse athlete.

You do not need to give millions of dollars to charity, have a nobel peace prize, or be in any position of power to be an outstanding citizen. An outstanding citizen is someone who provides to their fellow American community in the best way they know how. Germaine Johnson knew how to give back to the community around him by putting trust in the youth around him, and giving support to those who had no support to begin with. I have learned that positively influencing not only youth, but all those around me is my life commandment on how to be an outstanding citizen. While currently enrolled in college, I give back by tutoring underprivileged youths in academics, personal training cancer fatigue patients, teaching elementary school children sports, and pursuing the great occupation of occupational therapy to continue giving back because of the few who gave to me.

Derick Fong’s “Checks and Balances” Essay

There are few unique moments in my life that I can pinpoint as being crucial in making the person I am today. A jumble of innate traits, socialized characteristics, and cultural pulls all blend together into a black box of personality that I cannot hope to disentangle. But for all the confusion, I can point decisively to one event that would dramatically shape how I viewed the world and my place in it. That event was a political theory course during the spring semester of my freshman year, in which I was introduced to A Theory of Justice, a book by political philosopher John Rawls. In it, he laid out a thorough and comprehensive framework for creating a just society. What I found more personally significant, however, was his doctrine of reflective equilibrium.

At its most straightforward, reflective equilibrium is a state of coherence among a set of ethical principles arrived at through logical deliberation. In practice, this involves considering all of our moral judgments, determining whether they are compatible with each other, and changing those that are not. To deliberate sufficiently and achieve equilibrium, Rawls wrote, is to arrive at a basic sense of justice. While he did not necessarily envision this equilibrium expanding beyond the scope of beliefs into that of actions, I have found it to be an invaluable guide to practical ethics.

This cursory introduction to Rawls pushed me both to delve further into his ideas and to re-examine my own. I encountered the sobering realization that I had no systematic method of evaluating whether my actions lined up with my beliefs. I was just as ignorant as to whether my beliefs lined up with each other. I felt instinctively that something was wrong. So I started on the long trek toward uncovering my fundamental moral intuitions, organizing a consistent value set from those intuitions, and investigating whether my actions aligned with that value set.

Although that process began with concepts of political theory and Rawls’ A Theory of Justice, it expanded quickly. I soon identified the root of that inquiry as the discipline of moral philosophy. That revelation prompted me to add a philosophy major during my sophomore year and begin wading through the mountains of available literature. Through my professors – both inside and outside the classroom – I learned about an array of moral philosophers, from those I found rather unconvincing, like Baruch Spinoza and Immanuel Kant, to those I found very convincing, like Plato and Jeremy Bentham. These philosophers dug deeply into the basis for moral intuitions and all the downstream consequences flowing from them. Their writings pressed me to put my own views under the microscope, discard those previously held that did not withstand scrutiny, and accept those newly discovered that were compelling. I learned to distinguish a feeling of visceral disgust with an actual moral judgment, to faithfully relate ethical principles with actualities in the world, and to muster the discipline to modify my behavior when morality demanded it. I found philosophy, funnily enough, to be eminently practical in my everyday life.

As this development continues to the present day, I feel almost overwhelmed as my opinions and actions – from how I think of others to what I eat to how I judge right from wrong – change at a rapid pace and upend the way I approach living a good life. Yet out of all that turmoil, I consider the single most critical change to be that regarding my career. One of the conclusions stemming from my attempts at reflective equilibrium is a belief in the obligation to pursue a profession that helps to bring about justice into the world, however possible. While I have wanted to become a lawyer for as long as I can remember wanting to become something, the legal career I actually want to achieve has crystalized far more clearly during this ongoing process. I now know definitively that I want to complete a legal education, become a lawyer, work for a financial regulatory agency, and contribute my small part to a just society.

If I had an inclination for science, perhaps I would strive toward innovation in sustainable food sourcing. If I had an inclination for engineering, perhaps I would strive toward developing new efficiencies in energy generation. But I have neither. So with my inclination for the humanities, perhaps I can strive toward legally righting some wrongs.

LANDMARK VERDICTS & SETTLEMENTS

Hundred of Millions of Dollars Recovered for Our Clients
  • Birth Injury Involving Misuse of Drug to Induce Labor $70 Million

    $70 million arbitration award, the largest known medical malpractice arbitration award in U.S. history. David S Woodruff handled this birth injury case involving an HMO labor/delivery unit that misused Cytotec, a drug used to induce labor.

  • Settlement for Individuals Injured by a Defective Product $23 Million

    Settlement for group of individuals injured by a defective product. Dan was a member of a national team of lawyers who helped secure this settlement. The largest single settlement in the country was paid to Dan’s individual client.

  • Largest Medical Malpractice Settlement in Colorado $22.3 Million

    $22.3 million medical malpractice settlement. In 2016 David Woodruff obtained the largest known medical malpractice settlement in Colorado.

  • Medical Malpractice Verdict for Victim of Paralysis $15 Million

    A jury handed down a $15 million verdict to a man who was paralyzed from the chest down just hours after a doctor at Memorial Hospital in Colorado Springs discharged him. It’s the largest sum ever awarded in a medical malpractice suit in Colorado.

  • Drunk Driving Accident Resulting in Rollover Collision $8.91 Million

    Rollover collision – Steve Wahlberg represented the driver of a vehicle struck by a drunk driver. The Court entered judgment of $4,455,000 including 1.5 million in physical impairment, $4,455,000 in punitive damages.

  • Commercial Vehicle Accident Resulting in Catastrophic Injury $8 Million

    An attorney from our firm served as lead counsel in a contested liability accident involving a commercial vehicle. Our client was catastrophically injured and he successfully negotiated a $8,000,000 settlement on her behalf.

  • Birth Injury Verdict Involving a Misplaced Device $7.2 Million

    $7 million medical malpractice jury verdict. David Woodruff handled this birth injury case, which culminated in a 2-week jury trial in Colorado Springs. The case involved a physician who misplaced a “vacuum extraction device” while delivering the infant.

  • The Largest Personal Injury Verdict in Colorado in 2016 $6 Million

    Steve Wahlberg received the largest personal injury verdict in Colorado in 2016. They represented a pedestrian who was run over by a bus. The jury awarded the fourth largest verdict in Colorado History for permanent physical impairment.

  • Truck Accident Settlement for Client Struck by Falling Cargo $5 Million

    Mr. Nimmo settled a case on behalf of his client who was severely injured when he was struck by falling cargo that fell from a trailer.

  • Settlement for Woman Injured by Defective Cream Whipper $5 Million

    $5 million defective product settlement. David Woodruff represented a young woman severely injured by a “cream whipper” that exploded in her face, fracturing her skull in 7 places, causing extensive brain injury and permanent damage to her vestibular system.

Client testimonials

Real Stories From Real People
  • “Parker Stinar is astonishingly patient, thorough, and has the ability to communicate in laymen’s terms, putting things in terms I could understand. He always maintained a positive attitude, even in times I felt discouraged and lost.”

    - Brian M.
  • “Dan Sloane is very professional and impressed me during negotiations with his clever strategies. He sincerely cares and seeks justice. Dan knows what he's doing and won our case for us.”

    - Julie D.
  • “David Woodruff and his team worked long and hard for my settlement. They were able to get more than I expected. I would highly recommend them.”

    - Heather N.
  • “Michael Nimmo took my case that a dozen other lawyers rejected. He was incredibly thorough backing up everything with my doctors. He was supportive, caring, and obviously legally astute. He won the case and the award helped me to transition to retirement b”

    - Patty M.
  • “Throughout the entire process, Stephen Wahlberg and his staff were professional, timely, and went above and beyond in their empathetic approach to the family and diligence and confidence in pursuing the case. I highly recommend him to anyone.”

    - Catrina A.
  • “Dan Sloane of Denver Trial Lawyer was always there and helped guide me step by step through the process. He made the case easier for me to understand. I recommend him highly! Very trustworthy!”

    - Esther G.

Why Hire Denver Trial Lawyers

  • Hundreds of Millions in Recoveries

    We have represented thousands of individuals against insurance companies and corporations, recovering hundreds of millions in the process.

  • A Voice for Change

    Attorneys at our firm have been at the helm of cases that have gone on to influence legislation, change laws, and impact society for the better.

  • We Won't Settle For Less

    We are trial lawyers through and through, and we will take your case as far as it can go.

  • No Cost Unless We Win

    We represent clients on a contingency fee basis. We only get paid if we win your case.

  • Serving Our Community

    Giving back to our community is extremely important to us. We support a number of charitable programs.

  • A Passion for Justice

    Our goal is to level the playing field between our clients and the large companies and corporations they are up against.

Get a Free Consultation

There Are No Fees Unless We Win
  • Please enter your first name.
  • Please enter your last name.
  • Please enter your phone number.
    This isn't a valid phone number.
  • Please enter your email address.
    This isn't a valid email address.
  • Please make a selection.
  • Please enter a message.